Bareskrim Polri Reveals Varied Strategies in Fake Sea Fence Certificates Case
In a recent development, Bareskrim Polri has uncovered the differences in modus operandi concerning the alleged forgery of certificates in the sea fence cases in Tangerang and Bekasi regions. This revelation sheds light on the intricate nature of these fraudulent activities and the various tactics used by perpetrators to deceive authorities.
Director of General Crime of Bareskrim Polri, Brigadier General Djuhandani Rahardjo Puro, elaborated on the suspected forgery in the Tangerang sea fence case, stating that the falsification took place before the issuance of the Certificate of Land Rights (SHM). Unlike the case in Kohod, where document forgery was observed before or during the certificate issuance process, as highlighted by Djuhandani at Bareskrim Polri on Friday, February 14th, 2025.
Djuhandani pointed out that the alleged forgery occurred in the letter of application for measurement and acknowledgment of rights above the sea at the Land Office, Tangerang Regency. This letter is essential as a prerequisite for the issuance of the ownership certificate (SHM).
On the other hand, in the case of suspected SHM forgery in the Bekasi sea fence, the falsification occurred after the certificate had been issued. The alteration was allegedly made by changing the object in the SHM. Djuhandani explained that the certificate was previously issued and then modified under the guise of revision, involving changes in coordinates and names. This resulted in a relocation from land to sea, with a larger area covered.
Moving to the investigative phase, Bareskrim has examined 44 witnesses in the Tangerang sea fence case, including the Head of Kohod Village, Arsin, village residents, representatives from KJSB Raden Lukman, the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, and the Local Government of Tangerang Regency. The suspected forgery of SHM in the Tangerang sea fence case has been escalated to the investigation stage.
Meanwhile, the case of alleged forgery in the Bekasi sea fence is still under investigation, with authorities uncovering 93 SHMs suspected of being falsified. This ongoing process highlights the scope and complexity of the fraudulent activities surrounding sea fence certificates, underscoring the need for thorough and meticulous scrutiny in such cases.
Expert Insights and Future Implications
Expert Commentary on Fraudulent Certificate Practices
Renowned legal expert, Dr. Maya Sari, emphasized the importance of stringent verification procedures in the issuance of land certificates to prevent fraudulent activities. Dr. Sari stated, “Cases of forged certificates not only undermine the integrity of land ownership systems but also pose significant challenges for law enforcement agencies in uncovering such crimes.”
Echoing this sentiment, Chief Inspector General Darmawan Prasodjo highlighted the need for enhanced collaboration between various stakeholders, including government agencies, law enforcement, and local communities, to combat certificate forgery effectively. “By fostering a culture of transparency and accountability, we can deter individuals from engaging in fraudulent practices and secure the integrity of land ownership records,” said Inspector General Prasodjo.
Implications of Sea Fence Certificate Forgery
The proliferation of fake sea fence certificates not only jeopardizes the rights of legitimate landowners but also undermines public trust in the land registration process. As these cases continue to emerge across different regions, it is imperative for authorities to implement robust measures to detect and prevent fraudulent activities effectively.
Moreover, the economic ramifications of certificate forgery cannot be overlooked, as it can lead to disputes over land ownership, hinder investment opportunities, and disrupt the socio-economic stability of local communities. By addressing these challenges head-on and enhancing coordination among relevant stakeholders, law enforcement agencies can safeguard the interests of landowners and uphold the rule of law.
In conclusion, the revelations regarding the distinct modus operandi in the fake sea fence certificates case underscore the intricate nature of land certificate forgery and the pressing need for comprehensive reforms in land registration processes. By leveraging expert insights, fostering collaboration among stakeholders, and enhancing transparency in land transactions, authorities can mitigate the risks associated with fraudulent activities and uphold the integrity of land ownership systems for the benefit of all stakeholders involved.
