**Reasons for KPK Denying Hasto’s Request for Postponement: Pretrial and Investigation are Two Different Things**
In a recent development, the Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), Setyo Budiyanto, revealed the reasons behind the KPK’s rejection of a request for postponement of examination submitted by the General Secretary of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP), Hasto Kristiyanto.
**The Two Different Processes**
Setyo Budiyanto explained that Hasto’s request for postponement was denied because the pretrial process and investigation are two distinct matters. He highlighted that the nature of the request was such that it could not be accommodated, given the fundamental differences between pretrial proceedings and the ongoing investigation.
According to reports from Kompas.com, the examination of the alleged bribery case involving the replacement of a member of the Indonesian House of Representatives (DPR) for the 2019-2024 period and the obstruction of the investigation involving former PDIP politician Harun Masiku will proceed concurrently with Hasto’s pretrial proceedings.
**Upcoming Pretrial Hearing**
Hasto’s legal counsel, Erna Ratna Ningsih, confirmed that the pretrial hearing against the KPK will take place early next week. The hearing is scheduled for January 21, 2025, at the South Jakarta District Court.
Erna emphasized that despite the ongoing pretrial process, the KPK retains the authority to conduct investigations and potentially detain Hasto. This underscores the separation between legal processes and the autonomy of the KPK in pursuing corruption cases.
**KPK’s Stance on Investigation**
Echoing Setyo Budiyanto’s statements, KPK spokesperson Tessa Mahardhika Sugiarto clarified that the investigation into Hasto’s case will proceed independent of the pretrial proceedings. Tessa emphasized that the KPK maintains the ability to summon witnesses, conduct seizures, and pursue other investigative actions, including the possibility of detention, based on the discretion of KPK investigators and prosecutors.
Tessa’s remarks underscore the KPK’s commitment to upholding the rule of law and continuing its efforts to combat corruption, irrespective of legal challenges or procedural hurdles.
As the legal saga surrounding Hasto Kristiyanto unfolds, the KPK remains steadfast in its mission to uphold integrity and accountability in Indonesia’s public sphere. Stay tuned for further updates on this developing story.
—
**Related Articles:**
1. **Who are Saeful Bahri and Maria Lestari? Their Testimonies Sought by KPK Before Detaining Hasto Kristiyanto**
